Description in UTsC

If there is anything I hate in literature more than poor writing it is lengthy description. Its not that I'm some action whore and cannot wait for things to get moving, it is more that I have a difficult time picturing what authors are describing so description becomes cumbersome to my mind. I started to read a fantasy book by Terry Brooks in middle school. The book was large and the print was small. In the first two pages the author described a room, specifically a desk in a room. That was enough for me. I have been gun shy against him ever since.

While I hate description in general I love description of persons.  So far the only two authors to blow me away in this category are women, Jane Austin and now Harriet Beecher Stowe. Despite the weighty material in Uncle Tom's Cabin I often find myself laughing out loud and how perfectly she describes people, their motives, looks and idiosyncrasies. Especially satisfying are her conversations between men and women. Even the best husband (that I have read so far) has no clue how to understand his wife. While there is no mistaking her intelligence and sophistication the man cannot comprehend it, so he tries to accommodate his weaker and more emotional half in many ways, but each only proves he knows nothing of the fairer sex. Still the wife appreciate the misguided effort and his sincere desire to please her. The conversations between this couple are as subtle as real life, and just as humorous to an outsider looking in at any real live couple. You can sense in Stowe a liberated woman just waiting for the men of her generation to catch up, yet happy in her place in time and existence all the same.

I provide a brief reading here so you can get a feel for what I am talking about. Now, I hate reading quotes and excerpts in other people blogs, so feel free to pass over this and pick up after the italics if you are so inclined.

Now, little Mrs. Bird was a discreet woman, - a woman who never in her life said, "I told you so!" and on the present occasion, though pretty well aware of the shape her husband's meditations were taking, she very prudently forbore to meddle with them, only sat very quietly in her chair, and looked quite ready to hear her liege lord's intentions, when he should think proper to utter them... [he proceeds to announce that he must agree with her and help the slave get to Canada even though he is a senator that just past a law forbidding it]... "Your heart is better than your head in this case, John," said the wife, laying her little white hand on his. "Could I ever have loved you, had I not known you better than you know yourself?" And the little woman looked so handsome, with the tears sparkling in her eyes, that the senator thought he must be a decidedly clever fellow, to get such a pretty creature into such a passionate admiration of him.

Every chapter brings new characters and new conversations that delight and inspire me to work harder at my own observations. It is this realism she brings to her work that makes here conclusion inescapable: blacks are just as human as whites. While it almost sounds prejudice to say such a thing in our day it was a shocking conclusion in hers, but inescapable because of her sensitivity to the heart and soul of every person.

If you are averse to reading Austin because she wrote "girly" books, try Uncle Tom's Cabin.  Her understanding and appeal to the human heart is unmatched in anything I have read before.

This entry was posted in Literature. Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://www.xanga.com/mishraile Lonnie Smith

    PFFFT it offends me that you don’t like Terry Brooks. You should pick up his Landover Series and read that. It is GREAT! and not lengthy or bogged down. It is funny you mentioned Terry Brooks though, because I just finished a book by him a week ago called Running with the Demon…it was ok. ANYWAYS. thats my thoughts.

  • Steve in cali

    Terry Brooks is ridiculously detailed and boring. I tried to start reading another book of his a week ago and made it about ten pages.

  • http://www.xanga.com/mishraile Lonnie Smithe

    Hmm, methinks thou dost be ADD. I love detailed writing…if you think Terry Brooks is bad pick up some Robert Jordan (probably my favorite author). He can write fifty pages painting a picture for you before anything happens…or spend 25 more spiraling down into a characters mind…Yes, I love this…

    /shrug

    Others have complained about it. I think they just can’t sit still long enough to enjoy it.

  • http://theyomen.com Adam B.

    Certain things move me in writing, other do not. Descriptions of places and things are not moving, they just set the stage. I cannot connect with a desk or a place so I don’t want to read more about it than is necessary to give my imagination enough context to understand the characters. I do enjoy getting into character’s minds. I need to experiment with this a little in my own writing. It is a useful device that I have ignored up until now. I think it makes me a little nervous.

  • http://www.strangeconnections.blogspot.com Steven K

    If and when you do begin writing that delves into a character’s mind do not use journal entries to develop their thought processes. I hear this is a real cop out. I guess it’s kinda like writing a huge footnote in a paper instead of properly introducing the topic at hand.

  • http://theyomen.com Adam B.

    Noted.